<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An overview of tanking glyphs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs</link>
	<description>a (mostly) protection warrior blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CrazyIvanTR</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-3229</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyIvanTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-3229</guid>
		<description>Tried the sunder and devastate glyph combo. Doesn&#039;t work unfortunately...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried the sunder and devastate glyph combo. Doesn&#8217;t work unfortunately&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohando</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-499</guid>
		<description>With the sword and board proc frequence, i personally think that the devastate glyph is really necessary.

Our threat cycles will be modified with the S&amp;B proc, and we might do less devastate in the begining of the fight, so stack our five sunders will be a pain without this glyph.

Let&#039;s consider that the S&amp;B proc will compensate the lack of threat of 5 regular sunders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the sword and board proc frequence, i personally think that the devastate glyph is really necessary.</p>
<p>Our threat cycles will be modified with the S&amp;B proc, and we might do less devastate in the begining of the fight, so stack our five sunders will be a pain without this glyph.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s consider that the S&amp;B proc will compensate the lack of threat of 5 regular sunders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albinobeard</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Albinobeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-492</guid>
		<description>I think you guys are looking at using intervene in the completely wrong way.  The threat knock down makes it amazing for OTing but you shouldn&#039;t be Intervening the MTing, you should be intervening your highest DPS, and then using Warbringer to charge back at the boss to get that rage we oh so crave!

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Albinobeard&#180;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defensivestance.com/?p=19&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mitigation Stats, Your Favorite? My Favorite!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you guys are looking at using intervene in the completely wrong way.  The threat knock down makes it amazing for OTing but you shouldn&#8217;t be Intervening the MTing, you should be intervening your highest DPS, and then using Warbringer to charge back at the boss to get that rage we oh so crave!</p>
<p><abbr><em>Albinobeard&#180;s last blog post..<a href="http://www.defensivestance.com/?p=19" rel="nofollow">Mitigation Stats, Your Favorite? My Favorite!</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Has Satrina run her numbers on that at Tankspot? Will be interesting to find out. 

You have listed all five glyphs that I find really awesome, it&#039;s going to be a tough choice. I still don&#039;t have much of a clue how expensive the Glyphs will be matswise, to switch it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Has Satrina run her numbers on that at Tankspot? Will be interesting to find out. </p>
<p>You have listed all five glyphs that I find really awesome, it&#8217;s going to be a tough choice. I still don&#8217;t have much of a clue how expensive the Glyphs will be matswise, to switch it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Aww, you&#039;re breaking my heart here. But it would have been too good to be true.

I have no idea if I&#039;ll go for a Sunder or a Devastate glyph. How about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, you&#8217;re breaking my heart here. But it would have been too good to be true.</p>
<p>I have no idea if I&#8217;ll go for a Sunder or a Devastate glyph. How about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ohando</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Ohando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-485</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ll take inscription on my warrior when i can. So for my 4 major glyphs i&#039;ll take:
-Glyph of devastate (or glyph of revenge)
-glyph of blocking
-Glyph of heoric strike
-GLyph of sunder armor (or glyph of revenge)

I read somewhere that the threat bonus from the second sunder armor effect when you got the glyph of devastate was not the same as the first sunder armor effect.

I think it&#039;ll be like 1/2 of the threat from a regular sunder armor (i&#039;m not sure tough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ll take inscription on my warrior when i can. So for my 4 major glyphs i&#8217;ll take:<br />
-Glyph of devastate (or glyph of revenge)<br />
-glyph of blocking<br />
-Glyph of heoric strike<br />
-GLyph of sunder armor (or glyph of revenge)</p>
<p>I read somewhere that the threat bonus from the second sunder armor effect when you got the glyph of devastate was not the same as the first sunder armor effect.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;ll be like 1/2 of the threat from a regular sunder armor (i&#8217;m not sure tough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skaze</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Skaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Just got my hands on a devastate glyph and was sad to find out it doesn&#039;t stack a second sunder effect on an additional mob if you pair it up with the sunder armor glyph. Even though I didn&#039;t expect it to work I&#039;m somewhat let down about that. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got my hands on a devastate glyph and was sad to find out it doesn&#8217;t stack a second sunder effect on an additional mob if you pair it up with the sunder armor glyph. Even though I didn&#8217;t expect it to work I&#8217;m somewhat let down about that. <img src='http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gorbachop</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Gorbachop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I noticed that bug last night as well.  I&#039;m pretty sure it was popping spore&#039;s on Loatheb and mushrooms on Amanitar in Heroic: Ahn&#039;kahet even though it didn&#039;t looks like it was causing any damage.

It was nice for AOE threat though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that bug last night as well.  I&#8217;m pretty sure it was popping spore&#8217;s on Loatheb and mushrooms on Amanitar in Heroic: Ahn&#8217;kahet even though it didn&#8217;t looks like it was causing any damage.</p>
<p>It was nice for AOE threat though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trix</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Trix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Glyph of Sunder armor is good for AOE tanking since it applies the sunders (but as mentioned above, not the devestate damage).

It has a pretty annoying &quot;bug&quot; at the moment where if you are out in the world and a yellow-con mob (say a crab or something) it will tag that mob too, you&#039;ll have threat and will be forced to kill it. 

All the more annoying while you are doing DEHTA quests and killing an innocent animal will place a debuff on you for three minutes that makes DEHTA mobs not like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glyph of Sunder armor is good for AOE tanking since it applies the sunders (but as mentioned above, not the devestate damage).</p>
<p>It has a pretty annoying &#8220;bug&#8221; at the moment where if you are out in the world and a yellow-con mob (say a crab or something) it will tag that mob too, you&#8217;ll have threat and will be forced to kill it. </p>
<p>All the more annoying while you are doing DEHTA quests and killing an innocent animal will place a debuff on you for three minutes that makes DEHTA mobs not like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finelle</title>
		<link>http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/2008/09/30/an-overview-of-tanking-glyphs/comment-page-1#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Finelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tanklikeagirl.com/?p=284#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Intervene knocks 10% threat off, so I&#039;d hope an OT doesn&#039;t use it multiple times a fight, the threat penalty could get rather bad. Warbringer&#039;s Charge lets you stun the target for a second. I feel that Glyph of Intervene is about the same as Glyph of Taunt, if you&#039;re using those  quite a bit, something is rather wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intervene knocks 10% threat off, so I&#8217;d hope an OT doesn&#8217;t use it multiple times a fight, the threat penalty could get rather bad. Warbringer&#8217;s Charge lets you stun the target for a second. I feel that Glyph of Intervene is about the same as Glyph of Taunt, if you&#8217;re using those  quite a bit, something is rather wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
